Game-week 22 in La Liga featured one of the most interesting games of this season from a tactical standpoint. The highly anticipated match between Real Betis and Atletico Madrid was like a chess game between both coaches, with the better ending for Quique Setien and Real Betis. The 1-0 victory over Diego Simeone’s “Colchoneros” leaves the Green-and-Whites with 32 points, equalling Getafe in fifth position. Atletico Madrid, on the other hand, missed the opportunity to pressure Barcelona in the championship fight, trailing now with a six-point deficit. The following analysis will provide insights on the tactical aspects of the game and explain the reason for the victory of the home team. Looking at the offensive performance of Atletico Madrid, a special focus will be on the French superstar Antoine Griezmann.
Different gameplans as expected
As we know, both coaches differ in terms of how they want their teams to play. While Diego Simeone prefers a compact and defensively stable style, his opponent Setien is known for his to desire to control the ball and have high possession. Fans will remember that even against Real Madrid in early January, Betis dominated the game with a possession rate of scarcely believable 73.5%. Formation wise, both teams played in their preferred formation. Atletico Madrid used a 4-4-2 shape, while Betis played with a 3-5-2 formation. It should be noted however that Central midfielder William Carvalho missed the game due to a knee injury, which was a big loss for Real Betis. Since Lo Celso did not play as well, Wilfried Kaptoum made his La Liga debut. Alvaro Morata, on the other hand, made his first appearance for Atletico Madrid after his recent transfer from Chelsea.
Difficulties for Real Betis in the build-up
From the start of the game, Real Betis tried to control the game with a lot of possession. As consequence, they played a lot of short passes, as they have all season. Even goalkeeper Lopez avoids long balls when possible. In this game though, opponent Atletico Madrid closed down the centre superbly. We can see it in the following images.
Griezmann and Morata are near the halfway line and both mark Guardado. Furthermore, we can see that Canales and Kaptoum are also marked by the midfielders of Atletico Madrid. The back line doesn’t give the opponent space either, so there is no central passing option available to Real Betis. As a consequence, the back three rotate the ball from one side to another.
This image underlines the described difficulties. Notice that Bartra once again has no central passing option. Normally, the pass to Guardado (the white line) would be the preferred build-up for Real Betis, as we have seen before in other games this season. Barragan on the right side and Francis on the left side are playable since they are not marked, but this is not part of the initial plan for Betis.
In fact, if we look at the number of touches, we see that Francis only had 42 touches, while Feddal as left-centre back had 93 touches. The same pattern occurs for right-centre back Mandi (111 touches) and Barragan on the right flank (70 touches). These figures suggest that the pass out to the wing was not preferred by the centre-backs, which is clearly an instruction by Coach Quique Setien.
Occasionally, Marc Bartra moved into the central midfield position in order to create superiority in that zone. Thus, there was no longer a back three, but rather a back four with Barragan and Francis being not that high up the pitch. As Griezmann and Morata took Guardado out of the game, shifting Bartra forward made it more difficult for the Atletico strikers to follow that task.
With Bartra there, an additional passing option arose, so that Griezmann and Morata could not close all passing lanes. This was used once in a while, but not permanently. Also, Bartra tried to dribble forward into the midfield a few times, which followed the same purpose. Unfortunately for him and his team, he had to be substituted early in the second half due to an injury.
Real Betis too conservative
Quique Setien does not like long balls. But sometimes, they can be quite useful as well. Have a look at the following image.
On the left side, there is plenty of room to attack. Right-centre back Mandi has the ball and there is no pressure at all from Atletico. Morata is rather passive and only closes the passing lane towards the centre. On the left wing, Francis desperately wants the ball. If he receives it, a dangerous attack is probable. But instead of playing the long diagonal ball, Mandi decides to not take the risk. Rather he turns back and the back three starts the same build-up as we have seen in the previous images.
This, on the other hand, is a situation where you can attack on the wing once again, but you can get there easily with short passes. This time Barragan waits desperately for the ball, and he waves with his arms for quite a long time as well. Unfortunately, Canales loses the ball and the attack is over. Instead of circulating the ball faster, Real Betis often enough failed to use their good positional structure.
Another example can be seen here. One of the rare occasions where Atletico Madrid were exposed led to a situation where Real Betis could attack with numerical superiority. But once again, instead of playing the attack fast and powerful, a slow dribble ended the attack rather frustratingly. Therefore, goal chances were more or less non-existent. An individual run by Kaptoum, who fearlessly dribbles into the box, led to a situation that we want to look at in the following image.
Notice that besides Kaptoum, there is only one attacker in the box, while Atletico defend with six players in the box. The lack of courage could not be demonstrated any better. However, Real Betis were rather lucky that Felipe Luis, who came back from an injury and was substituted into the match in the second half, had an individual blackout and caused a penalty. Canales thankfully accepted the gift and scored the goal with the one and only real chance for Real Betis in the whole match.
Atletico Madrid strong defensively, weak offensively
As we have talked so much about Real Betis now, readers might ask about Atletico Madrid’s performance. In terms of defensive mechanism, we have provided some insights. Adding to that in order to get the full picture, we can say that Atletico had aggressive pressing moments as well like we are used to seeing from them. Here are two examples.
Other than that, the offensive gameplan was not all that extraordinary. In fact, Atletico relies pretty much on superstar Antoine Griezmann. In the first half, Griezmann would often fall back into midfield in order to get more touches and facilitate the attack. Two examples of that are provided with the following images
With the new signing Morata next to him, expectations were higher of Griezmann. In this first game though, it was obvious that the harmony between those two is not yet at the level it was with Diego Costa, who is currently injured.
In this image, we can see that Griezmann and Morata don’t occupy the free space. They are too close to each other. Diego Costa, however, is known for being excellent in making room for Griezmann. It will be interesting to follow the development of the relationship between Griezmann and Morata in the following months.
Besides that, Real Betis tried to mark Griezmann extremely tight and left him no space. One such example provides the following image.
One situation where Real Betis didn’t defend properly almost instantly led to the most dangerous position of the whole game, where Griezmann hit the post.
In this situation, he has too much space in such a dangerous position. The back line of Betis needs to shift better in order to mark him more closely. Sidnei, who was subbed in for Bartra, is just terribly positioned.
All in all, it was an intense game without all that much action. From a tactical standpoint, this game was highly interesting though. Diego Simeone found good measures to prevent Real Betis from building up the way they are used to. As a consequence, Betis didn’t have many chances in front of goal. The one chance, gifted by Filipe Luis, was enough though to win the game.
Even though Atletico played well (defensively more so), it is difficult to say that they deserved more. In the end, a draw would have been a fitting result though. In the last twenty minutes, when Atletico attacked more being 1-0 down, the pressure was remarkably high, but apart from the Griezmann chance big opportunities to score a goal were missing. Therefore, an improvement offensively is without a doubt necessary for Atletico to reach their goals for the rest of the season.
If you love tactical analysis, then you’ll love the digital magazines from totalfootballanalysis.com – a guaranteed 100+ pages of pure tactical analysis covering topics from the Premier League, Serie A, La Liga, Bundesliga and many, many more. Buy your copy of the January issue for just ₤4.99 here, or even better sign up for a ₤50 annual membership (12 monthly issues plus the annual review) right here.
Latest posts by Kaan Zengin (see all)
- UEFA Euro 2020 Qualifiers Tactical Analysis: Turkey vs France - June 11, 2019
- How Celtic crushed Aberdeen in the Scottish Cup Semi-finals - April 16, 2019
- Premier League Tactical Analysis: How Klopp’s tactical changes turned things round - April 8, 2019